Chill! ＂Star Wars＂ or the realization of US military ambitions is the poison of outer space peace.

　　　　　　 CCTV News:To pay attention to NATO’s space strategy. At the NATO defense ministers’ meeting held a few days ago, NATO adopted the first framework space strategy in history, and plans to officially launch the space strategy at the NATO summit scheduled for the end of this year, clearly listing space as a battlefield field alongside land, sea, air and network. Regarding the reasons for putting forward the space strategy, NATO officials once again talked about Russia, claiming that this is to cope with the growing space military strength of Russia and other countries.

　　　　　　 Reuters reported that NATO defense ministers reached an agreement at the Brussels meeting on June 26th and 27th, agreeing to formulate a space strategy. NATO member states will hold a meeting in London, England on December 3rd, when it will be officially recognized that member states can wage war not only in the fields of land, sea, air and network, but also in the field of space. The report quoted a senior NATO diplomat as saying: Although the relevant policies are still being discussed and formulated, the member States have basically reached a consensus on the decision to list space as a battlefield.

　　　　　　 In June 2018, NATO tried to launch a space strategy, but at that time it failed because of great differences between the parties, and finally released NATO’s first Joint Air Force Strategy. Some NATO member states believe that it is not cost-effective to promote the militarization of space. Trump’s previous announcement of the formation of a space force was opposed and criticized by the Pentagon and the US House of Representatives Armed Services Committee. If you follow the United States, it is likely that the loss will outweigh the gain.

　　　　　　 However, although NATO countries failed to reach an agreement on formulating a space strategy at that time, NATO’s "Joint Air Force Strategy" proposed that NATO should develop "Joint Air Force" in a "balanced and innovative" way, not only to continuously strengthen the anti-strike capability of space-based military facilities, but also to strengthen the utilization of these military facilities, which is the key goal of NATO’s future development. At that time, it was considered as a basic blueprint for NATO’s future development of space power.

　　　　　　 The U.S. government once threatened that the United States would occupy a "dominant position" in space, and other NATO countries flocked to it. Despite their differences, they still collectively please the United States. In the future, under the leadership of the United States, NATO may continue to further promote the militarization of space, so that "space NATO" can be transformed from a theoretical concept into a reality.

　　　　　　 But the United States must be clear that "absolute security" that cannot be achieved on land, sea and air will never be achieved in space. The absolute security sought by the United States simply does not exist, which will only further expand the strategic game and military confrontation with Russia into the space field, aggravate world turmoil, create more security dilemmas and bring more security risks. The "Star Wars" that once made human society shudder may become a reality in the future.

　　　　　　 Achieving win-win cooperation in the use of outer space is the general trend of the times. America’s military ambition in space can only be a poison to destroy peace and tranquility in outer space and ruin the original intention of outer space exploration. Whether other NATO countries continue to be at the mercy of the United States and play with fire, or focus on the general trend of the times and cherish peace, it is worth thinking twice.